Draft complaints, motions, and more — in your voice

Anything you have examples of. Beyond demand letters, firms use Eve to draft complaints, discovery responses and requests, motions, mediation briefs, meet and confer letters, letters of representation, bad faith letters, deposition outlines, expert designations, settlement agreements, and more. If you can provide two completed examples, Eve can learn to draft that document type in your style.

You upload two of your best completed documents — not blank templates, but actual finished work product — and Eve analyzes your tone, structure, formatting, letterhead, and even the specific language you use to describe things like injuries or objections. From that point on, every draft it generates for that document type mirrors how your firm actually writes. You can create separate agents per attorney, case type, or jurisdiction.

With Eve, you can expect a draft that's roughly 80–90% complete. You'll review for accuracy, fill in any details Eve flagged with brackets, and make adjustments to tone or emphasis — all inside the platform using inline editing. You can highlight a section and tell Eve to "make this more concise" or "emphasize pain and suffering" without leaving the tool. It's a strong first draft, not a final filing.

Eve is a closed system. It only pulls from the documents you upload and your Central Library, never from the open internet. It will not fabricate case citations. If your document requires case law, you upload the relevant authorities to your Central Library and Eve references them.

Yes. You upload opposing counsel's discovery requests and select the case files Eve should pull from to draft responses. Eve learns your objection language and style from your sample responses, so it applies objections the way your firm actually writes them — not generic boilerplate. It handles interrogatories, RFPs, and RFAs, and you can create separate agents for each if your formatting differs across discovery types.

Eve handles a wide range of complexity. Complaints, discovery, mediation briefs, and motions to compel all produce strong results. For highly complex documents like summary judgment oppositions or documents requiring extensive legal argument, expect to do more editing — the factual foundation and structure will be solid, but the legal reasoning may need refinement.